{"id":51552,"date":"2024-05-30T10:00:52","date_gmt":"2024-05-30T08:00:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ferrovial.com\/blog\/?p=51552"},"modified":"2025-12-12T00:20:22","modified_gmt":"2025-12-11T23:20:22","slug":"space-junk-management-where-does-it-all-go","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ferrovial.com\/blog\/en\/2024\/05\/space-junk-management-where-does-it-all-go\/","title":{"rendered":"Space junk management, where does it all go?"},"content":{"rendered":"

In its 2023 annual report<\/a> on space debris (data from 2022), the European Space Agency notes that there are approximately 10,705 tons of anthropogenic mass orbiting the planet; the sum total of the 32,540 objects humanity has left behind in space. And <\/strong>that figure is on the rise.<\/p>\n

This estimate relates solely to orbiting fragments that are large enough to be monitored. Active satellites, ‘dead’ satellites, remains from old space missions, spent fuel waste and scrap from explosions all surround planet Earth. Tons of waste orbit the planet, trapped in free-fall. How are we going to clean up space?<\/strong><\/p>\n

What is this ‘space trash’ made of?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

\"Gr\u00e1fica<\/p>\n

The number of objects in orbit has never been so high. And, as you can see in the following graph, it will have gotten even higher by the time you read this.<\/p>\n

\"Gr\u00e1fico<\/p>\n

Space junk comes from<\/strong> multiple sources. Firstly, there are the loads that are deliberately tossed away; tools that no longer serve a purpose, defunct panels, remains of spacecraft deemed best ejected, waste from missions such as the International Space Station, and so on. And then there are the missions into space that have reached their end – these components simply continue to orbit the planet; inert, waiting for Earth’s gravitational pull to engulf or throw them deep into space.<\/p>\n

The third type of space junk comes from ‘fragmentation events’; a rather elegant way of describing an object dividing into several smaller objects<\/strong>, stemming from a variety of scenarios including meteoroid collisions, military anti-satellite tests, accidental explosions, fuel residues (which freeze into solid matter), etc. The ESA data tells a fascinating story, estimating some 900,000 fragments measuring more than one centimeter <\/u><\/a>are out there somewhere, all too small for us to know precisely where they are.<\/p>\n

Kessler syndrome: humanity trapped on Earth?<\/h2>\n

The space waste conundrum goes beyond environmental practices or protecting space so that we can observe the universe. In 1991, NASA consultant Donald J. Kessler published a scientific article entitled ‘Collisional cascading: The limits of population growth in low earth orbit’<\/a>. This paper pointed to an unavoidable truth: the more matter there is orbiting the planet, the more the likelihood increases of a chain reaction of explosions and collisions, in turn causing further explosions and collisions<\/strong>. In fact, this idea wasn’t new. In 1960, Willy Ley had already demonstrated that once a certain amount of space waste was orbiting Earth, we would need to remove the junk to make space for new launches.<\/p>\n

You need only look at one example to understand the problem. When a small object collides with a one-ton satellite, the likelihood of the latter exploding – converting the whole mass into hundreds or thousands of small fragments of shrapnel – skyrockets. And this kicks off the process once again. None other than the ESA<\/a> and NASA<\/a> openly acknowledge that the number of catastrophic collisions will only rise in the coming decades<\/strong>, even if we stop launching objects into the orbit (blue line below). That’s just the matter that’s already out there. And if we continue to do so (that’s the red line), the increase will be remarkable.<\/p>\n

\"Gr\u00e1fico<\/p>\n

This is known as the Kessler syndrome<\/strong>; a phenomenon that could leave humanity stranded on Earth for centuries: if a chain reaction of collisions and shrapnel occurs before we’ve deployed the right technology to clean up the orbits, it simply won’t be possible to deploy the technology. And this means we won’t be able to enter or leave the planet safely, because every new attempt would produce even more debris.<\/p>\n

Space is unregulated, so who will regulate it? The regulator that…<\/h2>\n

One of the biggest challenges in space is the lack of specific regulations that assign responsibilities<\/strong> to companies and even individuals (the mega-rich, at present) or make it possible to have accountability. The waste on the surface of our planet is indeed regulated, and more and more companies are being asked to take charge of their waste externalities. Meanwhile, space (or ‘outer space’ to use the international legal term) is the Wild West. The \u2018Space Sustainability report<\/u><\/a>\u2018 lays it all out.<\/p>\n

As stated in the recently published UN report ‘For All Humanity \u2013 the Future of Outer Space Governance<\/a>‘, there are indeed frameworks between countries that “have served the international community well, in preventing conflict in outer space and facilitating safe and sustainable space activities”. Challenges in terms of space traffic coordination are becoming increasingly complex, and there is a lack of consensus on how to solve some issues. The concern is that excess waste will make it impossible to use satellites from now to hundreds of years in the future.<\/p>\n

\"Gr\u00e1fico<\/p>\n

Solving the space junk conundrum<\/h2>\n

Recommendations from the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space include increasing the transparency of countries, creating protocols and governance frameworks, and improved management of space traffic, with a particular focus on getting rid of space junk, or removing disused debris from space. The solutions include:<\/p>\n